Inside the
Mind of Mikie Metric 
Click to see earlier Blog
entries.
(also scroll down this page)
| Witness
a Case of Capital Blogicide
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - This will be my last entry to this blog. I am putting it to bed. I am killing it off. I am consigning it to the shadow world of defunct web sites and obsolete web pages. Why? you might ask. Why not? I might reply. This project was just part of a series of actions I've taken with the primary goal of increasing traffic to my successful web sites in order to generate more ad revenue from Google. Traffic to my most effective site, www.say-it-in-english.com , has grown to over a thousand visits a day. When I started this "growth program", my other two sites totaled about 10 to 15 visits a day. I figured I had to do something to bring in more traffic. One suggestion was to write a blog and use that to direct traffic to my web sites, so I signed up with Blogspot, set up my page with all the "bells and whistles" available, and began writing. I wrote every day, about politics, my opinion about politics, about personal experiences that I thought might be interesting to other people. I added relevant photographs and links to neat sites or information. I put notices about the blog and links to it on my other web pages. I waited for results. After a couple of months, my hit counter told me the blog site was averaging 4 or 5 visits a day, and I think one or two of those was me. This wasn't going to be much help for my other sites, because they were already getting more traffic than that. Alright! I thought. By having my blog on Blogspot, I felt that I was lost in the crowd, was just one voice among the thousands enrolled. I shoved the existing content of one of my poorly-producing sites into a back room of the site and set up my own blog in the front parlor. I put links to and notes about the "New Blog" on my hundred or so other web pages. Then I began writing. I wrote about current events. I wrote about cultural issues. I wrote about what other bloggers were writing about. I even changed or added key words to my page's HTML and up-dated notes about the blog contents on many of my other pages, sometimes on a daily basis. I didn't have all the features the "real" blogs had, like the capability of accepting comments from readers and the automatic saving or caching of older blogs. For comments, I included instructions for readers to copy and paste my e-mail address into their mail forms to send me a note because I had removed all e-mail links form my pages to foil spammers. When the first page grew too long, I sep up a "Past Blogs" page that I then had to transfer articles to regularly. Eventually, that page became too long, also, so I organized the blogs into categories and installed each category on its own page. This grew to a half-dozen "special category" pages before I began just deleting the blogs that had limited appeal or were already out of date. The whole process was getting unwieldy. About the time I started my very own blog, I also realized that I had to have some way to drive traffic to the blog which was to drive traffic to my other web sites. My son, the computer whiz, recommended that I use Twitter. He said all I had to do was get a large following and direct them to my websites to beef up the Google ad income. It sounded easy. I set up not only one Twitter account, but three of them, one for each web site. At first, I tried to keep the Twitter comments consistent with the subject matter of the web sites I linked the comments to. After doing this one, two or even three times a day, for week after week, along with the daily entries to the blog, I was plumb running out of things to say. I continued this way for a few months, juggling my writing tasks with maintaining my web sites, answering e-mails, selling stuff on E-bay and having a decent social life. I finally realized that my blog site was still averaging a mere 10 visits a day. This was not worth the effort. That was when I decided to expend my time and energies in other endeavors. All past writings will still be available for the foreseeable future. Just follow the various links on the Main Blog Page. Adios. Ciao. Aloha. Adieu. Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.) |
Obama "The Fair" on Display
Thursday, February 25, 2010 - Politicians sat around the table today in response to President Obama's invitation to hash out compromises for the faltering Health Care plan. After denying that the Republicans even had any plans or ideas for months (despite the fact that major Republican ideas had been posted on the White House's web site for at least two weeks), Obama today said he had reviewed or gone over the plans submitted by several Republicans and was now ready to discuss them, even though the plans were not very good, not as good as the Democrats' plans. The President interrupted presentations by Republicans several times, made snide remarks about the presenter or about the content of the plans, and was anything BUT responsive to compromise.
The Democrats were not willing to back down from any of their established positions. This was generally expected by the Republicans, but they figured they had to put in an appearance or be called Obstructionists. However, their appearance did not stop the worn-out charges of their being Obstructionist from being leveled.
It seems to me to be the height of folly for Obama to be expending so much time, energy and voter good-will to try to force through this bill in spite of the wide-spread public opposition to it. It seems that he is perfectly willing to destroy his party's chances in the next election to try to push through this ridiculously out-sized and pork-filled bill. It just doesn't make sense unless one looks at it as the first necessary step for the government to gain control of a sizable segment of life in America. If the government controls health care by setting rules for Insurance companies, setting rules for how much doctors and hospitals can charge, setting rules for how much pharmaceutical companies can charge, and ultimately setting rules for what foods we would have to eat and what activities we had to or couldn't engage in (in the name of reducing risk and lowering medical costs), then we have lost whatever semblance of freedom we had left. For people who think like Obama, this is the ultimate goal, putting them in power and saving us from ourselves.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
Are Democrats Suffering from Palinphobia?
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 - For the past year-and-a-half, it seems that even the bare mention of the name "Sarah Palin" can bring about a severe and violent reaction in die-hard Democrat voters. I've heard the former governor of Alaska called cheap, naive, inexperienced, trailer-parkish, unintelligent, conniving, clownish and a host of other derogatory things. Could it be fear on their parts that causes such antipathy? Fear that she embodies the conservative values that a majority of people in the country support and believe in? Fear that if Palin would be allowed to proceed unhindered she might actually gain high office, or even the presidency?
I've read criticisms of Sarah Palin by journalists and political figures that were scathing. Everything about her, from her hair to her shoes, from her pronunciation to her delivery was ridiculed. I watched some of the same speeches or presentations, trying to spot some of the horrible things that were written about her, but I couldn't. She does talk in a sing-song cadence at times, and uses some stock, cliched expressions, but she is far from being the worst public speaker I've ever heard.
The situation reminds me a lot of the book I am reading, "Executive Orders" by Tom Clancy. The main character, Jack Ryan, became president due to an act of terrorism wiping out most of the rest of the government. Jack is not a politician. He doesn't lie or dissemble. His only agenda is to "fix" the bloated, corrupt, inefficient government by choosing honest, effective people to fill the gaps and run the departments. However, it is impossible for the Washington "In-crowd", the journalists, bureaucrats and the surviving politicians to believe Jack is who he claims to be. They attribute devious motives and hidden agendas to everything he says or does, because this is the way government has always been for them. I see the same thing happening to Sarah Palin. The "Washington Establishment" will do everything it can to destroy her because it sees itself threatened by her freshness and honesty.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
Adventures in Gluten-Free Cooking
Sunday, February 14, 2010 - My girlfriend brought home some mini-cupcakes left over from a Valentine party she had attended. They looked nice with pink or red icing, with sprinkles on them. I couldn't eat any of them. At my mother's house, on the kitchen table, I saw containers or packages of Tastee Kake cupcakes, assorted cookies, two kinds of flavored crackers, and other munchies. I could eat Doritos, period. Enough is enough, I said to myself. I needed something to eat that was at least kind of like what I used to eat.
I boiled a couple of turkey thighs in water that I enhanced with chicken bouillon. When the meat was done, I removed it from the broth and set it aside to cool. Then, using corn starch as a thickener, I turned the broth into a gravy base. Next, I removed all the meat from the thigh bones, cutting it into small bite-sized pieces. I stirred the meat into the gravy and heated it for 30 to 40 minutes. After allowing the gravy to cool part way, I put it into the refrigerator. That evening, following the recipe printed on the box, I mixed up dough for a batch of drop biscuits.
The gluten-free baking mix was made by Arrowhead Mills and claimed to be 73% organic. Would that be kind of like being 3/4 pregnant? It contained organic brown rice flour, organic potato starch, etc. The recipes seemed to be suitable for every allergy under the sun, but since I was only concerned with the gluten, I made some substitutes. I used baking powder which contained an aluminum compound, In place of the soy or dairy yogurt, I used one one whole egg. Where the recipe called for 1/4 cup of Rice Drink, I put in an equal volume of whole milk. After mixing the concoction thoroughly with a fork and spoon, I placed egg-sized gobs of the batter on a greased cookie sheet.The result? Nine sort of flat, tannish biscuits that, when broken up in the turkey gravey, tasted just fine, although a bit on the grainy side.
.Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
How Careful Do I Have to Be to Stay Gluten-Free?
Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - Another morning of gas, minor explosions and loose stools. Why? I was foolish enough yesterday afternoon to put half a packet of old, dried miniature marshmallows in the cup of hot chocolate I had for a snack. I knew that modified food starch was listed among the ingredients on the bag of miniature marshmallows my girlfriend opened last week, but the packet I had was old, left over from Christmas. The little pieces of candy were shriveled and dried out. Besides, maybe they were made by a different company, one that didn't use modified food starch. Such was the way my mind handled the situation. Guess I was wrong.
Breakfast today was good. After eating a navel orange, I thawed out two berry-flavored frozen waffles, toasted and buttered them, while frying two eggs, which ended up with hard yokes. All in all, it was a decent breakfast.
I will need to buy groceries today. I have a list started- meats, frozen veggies, fresh fruit, celery, milk, and various non-food items. I will look for a brand of baked beans that doesn't contain wheat in one form or another. I like to keep beans on hand for a quick meal - I cut up hotdogs in the beans and heat them, since I can't eat the dogs on bread or a roll as I used to do. My cereal is fine for now - a store-brand chex type and gluten-free Cheerio-look-alikes that taste nothing at all like real Cheerios. I would like to get some pasta, but the gluten-free stuff costs about $3.79 for a 16 oz. package. Maybe I'll get one, just to try it out. I would also like to get some frozen entrees, if I can find any in the "real" food department that don't contain some form of gluten. Last week my friend bought me a gluten-free frozen package of macaroni and cheese (using rice pasta) which tasted okay, but it cost well over three dollars for about 8 ounces of food. I'll have to think about that.
Should I buy canned soups, I
wonder. The last two cans I tried were not that good. I've
noticed that manufacturers tend to double and triple up on the
"healthful" aspects of their foods. Not only are foods
"low in sodium" , with "50% less fat" and claim to be
cholesterol-free, some of them also state proudly that they are
"gluten-free". In fact, many of the products have
eliminated so many of the potentially harmful elements that the taste has
been eliminated, too.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut
and paste into your e-mail program.)
The Fun of Being Gluten Intolerant
Monday, January 25, 2010 - When I was told the results of the blood tests came back negative, that there were no gluten antibodies in my blood, I had mixed feelings. On one hand, it would be simpler if I had a recognized condition to hang my symptoms on. On the other hand, Celiac disease carries with it a lot of potentially bad garbage. I figured it was time for more on-line research.
I read that up to 15% of people have gluten sensitivity to one degree or another, while only about 1% of the population actually had Celiac Disease. That sounded good to me. I would rather be sensitive than have a disease. It didn't really change anything for me, however. I still had to try to eliminate wheat products and other sources of gluten from my diet, and in the process, try to figure out just how sensitive I was. I had read that people at the extreme end of the sensitivity scale have to avoid foods that have been processed on machinery or equipment that might have processed wheat sometime in the past. I had a chance to eliminate that possibility for myself when I consumed chocolate covered raisins and nuts and roasted almonds over the holidays that came with that particular warning on the package. I had no adverse reaction.
From time to time, I will have one or two trips to the bathroom that are less than ideal - gas, looseness, outright diarrhea - and be unable to pinpoint what I might have eaten or drunk that would have caused it. I suppose it's possible for such irregularities to occur for reasons that have nothing to do with gluten. Other times, I can come up with a probable reason, like the time last week that I ate one piece of cream-filled chocolate candy from a Whitman's Sampler box, in spite of the label saying the contents contained modified food starch. The following morning I experienced one explosion and three watery BM's before it ran its course.
Maintaining a tasty, interesting, safe diet has proven to be a hassle. I made some home-made pizza the other night, using pre-baked, gluten-free pizza shells. Two 8" shells cost $8.99. I added shredded mozzarella cheese, bottled pizza sauce and slices of pepperoni. When they came out of the oven, they were edible, but nothing like the very thin crusted pizzas I used to buy from an area shop. On a brighter note, one morning last week I made pancakes and eggs for breakfast, using a gluten-free baking mix. Not bad at all. It gives me hope.
This morning I had more unsatisfactory trips to the bathroom and am unable to remember anything I might have eaten that could have caused it. During the search for a reason, however, I found out that the Jujubes that I've been snacking on for the past year contain modified food starch, BUT after this disclosure on the candy box, the word potato in parentheses was included, which means they are safe for me.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
Celiac Disease or Just Gluten Sensitivity? - A Special Report
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 (53) -
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
A Shrinking Native-born Professional Work Force?
Saturday, February 6, 2010 - I've read several articles in which the quality of young people entering the work force has been lamented. Criticisms cover a wide range of deficiencies: being unable to fill out a job application accurately or correctly; submitting resumes that bear little resemblance to reality; arriving at an interview sporting tattoos or piercings; arriving at an interview wearing inappropriate clothing; being consistently late; not showing up for work and not calling in or having a legitimate excuse; being unable or unwilling to follow a series of instructions; etc. I have encountered young people who actually became irate when they were expected to do a job that was physically demanding or that entailed getting dirty.
I could speculate for the rest of this entry over the reasons for the younger generation being so poorly prepared to enter the job market - not required to do chores at home, unreasonable opinions of their value to an employer, laziness, a poor attitude, etc. - but it's enough to say that it is a fact. Again, I am not talking about all young people, just a growing segment of them.
At the same time, there are thousands of jobs that have been filled by young immigrants, jobs in warehouses and distribution centers, jobs in a wide variety of manufacturing and assembly plants, jobs that were paying decent wages, but that expected a decent day's work in return. I've been in facility after facility in which the main operating language was other than English - Spanish, Portuguese, Cantonese, Tagalog, etc.
The same shift is taking place at the professional level- engineering, medical fields, technical trades. It seems that not enough native-born Americans want to take the "tough" courses, the maths and sciences, that are necessary to prepare for the professional-level careers. I've read that up to 50% of the students in many engineering and medical programs are non-Americans. You can see the results for yourself if you visit most any American hospital or the engineering departments of major manufacturers - professionals from Africa, India, the Philipines, South America, etc. I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I think, "Isn't it great that people from all over the world can come here and succeed." On the other hand, I think, "Why don't more American kids get off their butts and do something worthwhile with their lives." I have no answer.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
Will the U.S. Have Enough Qualified Workers When the Economy Does Recover?
Friday, February 5, 2010 - The United States is beginning to pay the price for the decades of under-educating and over-protecting our younger generations. (Before I go any farther, I want to qualify my remarks. There are now and always have been many young people who study hard, work hard, have acquired good values and work ethics, and are a tribute to their families, their neighborhoods and their country. The problem is that the percentage of young people who fit this description is getting smaller and smaller. Kids who turn out this way seem to have become the exception rather than the norm.) The primary cause for the decline in educational achievement, competitiveness and productivity seems to be the education establishment itself.
I was all set to get into an analysis of the federal, state and local education establishments, but then I realized I was not that knowledgeable about any of it. I was going to try the same thing I used to do on essay tests in school - Use a lot of words and a few facts and a fair amount of BS and hope somebody was impressed. Instead, I will only give my impressions of what I know.
In many school districts around the country, common sense seems to have fallen by the wayside. Because of the excessively-publicized incidences of violence in a few schools, and because of a few ridiculous court cases involving disgruntled over-protective parents, now school districts every where have instituted "Zero Tolerance" systems. This has led to students being suspended for giving a friend with a headache a Tylenol, for bringing fingernail clippers to school, for drawing a picture of a gun on a sheet of tablet paper, for hugging a friend who was crying over home problems, and many similar incidents. It has gotten so bad in some places, that the good kids feel like they are in jail instead of school.
As part of the educational establishment's goal of protecting every child from every possible physical and psychological harm, these steps have been taken in various schools: any playground activity that has any chance of causing a child to be hurt, including tag and all running, has been banned; any competitive games that involve someone being IT and possibly having his or her self-esteem damaged have been banned; sports games such as kickball, soccer, baseball are not allowed to keep score so no-one will be a loser. How in the world can life like this prepare children for the real world? More later.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)
The Fictional Nature of the State of the Union Speech
Thursday, January 28, 2010 - I had the television set on and tuned to Obama's State of the Union speech last night, but I have to admit that I didn't listen to every word. So much of it seemed to be a repeat of speeches I had heard before, and was describing events and a country that I had trouble recognizing. Several times during the speech, I caught a statement that caused me to raise my head from the task I was involved in and say to my girlfriend, "That's just not true!" I don't need to get into specifics, because this has been dealt with over and over on many web sites, in the post-speech commentaries as well as in the Fact Checks done by several sources. My main objective is to express my wonderment at how a person who has obtained the top political position in our country can remain so clueless and out of touch with the values and attitudes of a majority of the population.
Is President Obama so aloof and self-centered that he thinks it doesn't matter what the citizenry believes if it runs counter to his goals and aspirations? Or is the President kept insulated from the bulk of the disagreements and controversy by the people who are "handling" him? No matter how much his disapproval figures grow, no matter how much disagreement with his policies is remarked on by the media, he continues to doggedly plow forward towards Universal Health Care, towards a socialist-style "nanny state" in which the government will handle all the problems the citizens might encounter. In spite of his multitude of speeches giving lip service to bi-partisanship and upholding the values of freedom, capitalism and entrepreneurial spirit, his actions give the lie to his words.
The State of the Union speech was just the latest example of Obama's blaming all the country's problems on the Bush administration, and how the problems were so large that even HE has been unable to undo all of them yet. In last night's speech, the President commented on how bad things had been during the past decade and saying that he couldn't undo 10 years of wrong decisions in one year. It seems that he forgot that the economy was booming, the stock market climbing, unemployment at the lowest level ever, tax revenues soaring (in spite of tax cuts by Bush), until late in 2007. This was hardly the "past decade".
I had the impression that the President's speech was written by someone who had been out of town for the past year and just zoomed into town to write the speech based on what he remembered of Obama's mesmerized followers last year and the biased political updates fed to him by insider hacks. The words coming from the teleprompter just didn't seem to match the reality of the world around us.
Comment at comments@mikiemetric.com (cut and paste into your e-mail program.)